Difference between revisions of "Why we are not using booki for TTFA2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* this is booki's strength, but its not not good enought that we don't have to do cutting pasting and typesetting --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | * this is booki's strength, but its not not good enought that we don't have to do cutting pasting and typesetting --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Interaction features == | == Interaction features == |
Revision as of 15:58, 17 April 2012
The basic reason, we prefer Mediawiki for this particular project.
Editing
As an editor Booki has the following issues
- the writing column is too small --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Publishing
- this is booki's strength, but its not not good enought that we don't have to do cutting pasting and typesetting --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Interaction features
- comments per page/chapter - our project needs to have a discussion section for each page (killer feature of Mediawiki) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)