Difference between revisions of "Why we are not using booki for TTFA2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | * versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
* granular editing - docs and changes are not on a per paragraph basis, shame --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | * granular editing - docs and changes are not on a per paragraph basis, shame --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | = Notes = | ||
+ | == Booki Developer Interaction == | ||
+ | IRC interaction is recommended and happens at: | ||
+ | server: freenode.net | ||
+ | channel: #flossmanuals |
Revision as of 19:50, 17 April 2012
The basic reason, we prefer Mediawiki for this particular project.
Editing
As an editor Booki has the following issues:
- the writing column is too small making it tricky to edit in --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Publishing
- this is booki's strength, but its not not good enought that we don't have to do cutting pasting and typesetting, so it doesn't really help --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Interaction features
- comments per page/chapter - our project needs to have a discussion section for each page (killer feature of Mediawiki) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- granular editing - docs and changes are not on a per paragraph basis, shame --Gremble 14:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Notes
Booki Developer Interaction
IRC interaction is recommended and happens at:
server: freenode.net channel: #flossmanuals