Difference between revisions of "Why we are not using booki for TTFA2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* comments per page/chapter - our project needs to have a discussion section for each page (killer feature of Mediawiki) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | * comments per page/chapter - our project needs to have a discussion section for each page (killer feature of Mediawiki) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
* versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | * versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | * granular editing - docs and changes are not on a per paragraph basis, shame --[[User:Gremble|Gremble]] 14:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:59, 17 April 2012
The basic reason, we prefer Mediawiki for this particular project.
Editing
As an editor Booki has the following issues:
- the writing column is too small making it tricky to edit in --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Publishing
- this is booki's strength, but its not not good enought that we don't have to do cutting pasting and typesetting --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Interaction features
- comments per page/chapter - our project needs to have a discussion section for each page (killer feature of Mediawiki) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- versioning doesn't work, and isn't on a per chapter basis - I would describe this a as a (killer feature of Mediawiki for our project) --Gremble 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- granular editing - docs and changes are not on a per paragraph basis, shame --Gremble 14:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)