Difference between revisions of "BarnCamp 2019 ideas scratchpad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tag: visualeditor |
Tag: visualeditor |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
This is the end of the example. | This is the end of the example. | ||
| − | ==Critical appraisal of | + | ==Critical appraisal of research papers on medical treatments== |
;Proposed by: [[Special:EmailUser/MaRk|Mark]] | ;Proposed by: [[Special:EmailUser/MaRk|Mark]] | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* Depending on the prior abilities of the group; | * Depending on the prior abilities of the group; | ||
** Choose a paper on a subject of interest | ** Choose a paper on a subject of interest | ||
| − | ** Work in small groups to critically appraise the paper | + | ** Work in small groups to critically appraise the paper, using a workbook |
** Present your results around the campfire later | ** Present your results around the campfire later | ||
This workshop can be run at a number of different levels, from A-level to MSc, so you must be open about your starting level in understanding science. | This workshop can be run at a number of different levels, from A-level to MSc, so you must be open about your starting level in understanding science. | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 11 May 2019
Example Entry
- Proposed by
- Exampley Mc Exampleface
- Time
- 3-4 years
- Level
- Some experience of using a wiki required
- Resources
- Laptop and 10 mice, USB hub (10 port)
- Number
- up to 10 people all huddled round a laptop and USB hub with 10 mice in it
You will learn how to make generic fictional entries into wiki pages, demostrating the format of the page expected, together with some humour. You will also use bullet points to:
- show how bullet points are used in Mediawiki
- add some much needed recursive self reference
- make friends
You'll then finish off your description with how exciting workshop will be, or with an uncomfortable orphan sentence type paragraph.
This is the end of the example.
Critical appraisal of research papers on medical treatments
- Proposed by
- Mark
- Time
- 2-4 hours depending on level of interest
- Level
- A GCSE (or equivalent) (minimum) in any science subject.
- Resources
- Projector and screen. All participants to provide own laptop, and preferably notepaper & pencil: Unfiltered network access
- Co-facilitators with knowledge of analytical stats and/or biomedical research welcome
- Number
- up to 20 people
You will:
- learn why there is a hierarchy of evidence in medical research
- learn how that helps to understand controversies in medicine
- learn how to search for medical publications using free online resources
- remember Aaron Schwartz
- Depending on the prior abilities of the group;
- Choose a paper on a subject of interest
- Work in small groups to critically appraise the paper, using a workbook
- Present your results around the campfire later
This workshop can be run at a number of different levels, from A-level to MSc, so you must be open about your starting level in understanding science.